On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:40:08 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:42:17 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:30:38 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>How precisely is that out of context? I posted the entire quote. It was in
>>>response to the following post by Rune:
>>>
>>>...or post images to p.b.i without any interest in getting feedback or
>>>even if other people can see the images. I expect that we'll be seeing
>>>quite some more JPEG2000 images there now - oops, "seeing" was not a
>>>well chosen word... ;)
>>>
>>>I don't think it's at all "out of context", as in both cases the topic at
>>>hand is proper use of povray.binaries.images. In any case, this is *your*
>>>"silly little argument". If you're so unhappy with the situation, *leave*.
>>>
>> 
>> Now you give the greater detail. Sheeh! Dear me. I think you need to
>> leave if you cannot get it right first time.
>> 
>
>Wow, ad hominem arguments. Very professional and effective. So, now,
>buddy, what exactly is your defense regarding your use of p.b.i?

As previously stated. Read up on it. Do I have to show you flash cards
like you were trying with me just now? 

"This is an apple. Apple. Repeat after me. Apple."

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message